Score audit
jtsla4 @jtsla4
Every input is listed below — the score is the Wilson lower bound of the win rate over the decided calls, so anyone can recompute it. Methodology
Resolved calls (8)
4 wins + 4 losses = the decided base; 0 breakevens are resolved but carry no win/loss signal, so they sit outside it.
“I bought $MRVL shares here at $164 and will sell at $180”
“Don't be surprised if we see $NBIS $200 within the next 8 days, score 10.0 @blademapai , I am long”
“I’m long $MU , 5/01 $450 calls https://t.co/bUTR4tBgvX”
“Bought $AMD 4/02 $230 calls here at 2.15”
“The score is 10.0 on these calls, I have decided to buy a tiny position of 3/27 MU $420 calls here at 7.00 My position is small so I can swing it overnight with no stress, if you don’t feel the same way you shouldn’t be taking this. I’m sizing small due to the fact the indexes have only rallied into a decline daily 5ma level”
“Blademap says institutions are buying $AMD calls with 10.0 score, the highest score on Blademap I just bought 3/27 $210 calls here at 3.25 https://t.co/VSRMBg2ZeR”
“I bought some 3/27 NVDA $175 puts here at 2.05 Stop loss is daily 5s at $178~ https://t.co/mEdEz4UTAP”
“Institutions buying $TSLA $385 puts, I bought some 3/20 $390 put here for 4.40 We need to lose and close below the hourly 5s ($395), that’s my stop loss as well (failure to close below $395 by 7am pst)”
Falsifiable, not yet decided (0)
Open or untriggered — these count against coverage until they resolve.
No falsifiable level (7)
Calls with no stated target or stop can't be scored — they feed the unverified 1-Week Read instead and count against coverage. Not listed individually.
Call text is shown as captured at seed time; deleting the post on X does not remove it here. This audit is a record of public calls and their market outcomes — not financial advice, and never a recommendation. Dispute an attribution: claim this profile to correct it.